Connect with us

Latest News

Pakistan ‘does not want armed conflict with Afghanistan’

Published

on

Following Pakistan’s airstrikes in Paktika and Khost provinces on Monday, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Islamabad will not tolerate any form of cross border terrorism.

He said during a cabinet meeting on Wednesday: “We will not tolerate any form of terrorism from across the borders under any circumstances.”

Sharif emphasized that Pakistan’s borders are a red line against terrorism and that “terrorism must be eradicated.”

In the past year, Pakistan has consistently accused the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) of supporting terrorist groups such as the Tehreek- e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and has repeatedly urged the IEA to take serious action against this group and hand over its leaders to Pakistan.

However, the IEA has consistently denied Pakistan’s allegations.

Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif meanwhile says his country does not want to engage in an armed conflict with Afghanistan.

“Force is the last resort. We do not want to have an armed conflict with Afghanistan,” Asif said, speaking exclusively to VOA.

However, he warned that Islamabad could block the corridor it provides to landlocked Afghanistan for trade with India, saying Pakistan has the right to stop facilitating Kabul if it fails to curb anti-Pakistan terrorists operating on Afghan soil, VOA reported.

“If Afghanistan treats us like an enemy, then why should we give them a trade corridor?” he said.

This comes after Monday’s airstrikes against alleged militant hideouts in Paktika and Khost provinces in Afghanistan following an insurgent attack by Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) in Pakistan’s Waziristan on Saturday.

Pakistan claims Afghanistan’s leaders are not cracking down on TTP in the country - a claim the IEA rejects.

Five women and three children were killed in Monday’s airstrikes. IEA spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid meanwhile warned of serious consequences earlier this week.

“Pakistan should not blame Afghanistan for the lack of control, incompetence and problems in its own territory. Such incidents can have very bad consequences, which will be out of Pakistan's control,” Mujahid said in a statement.

Following the airstrikes, security forces along the Durand Line retaliated and targeted Pakistani military posts with “heavy weapons."

Since Tuesday, a tense calm has prevailed along the 2,600-kilometer-long border.

Experts meanwhile say that while the IEA does not have the military might to attack Pakistan, the Islamic Emirate could use unconventional means, including actively supporting anti-Pakistan militants, to respond if aggression from Islamabad grows.

“If they can harm us, then we’ll be forced to [retaliate],” Asif said, while expressing hope that Afghanistan would meet the “single demand” of reining in TTP, preventing the need for future military strikes from Pakistan.

Reacting to Monday’s strikes, the U.S. State Department urged Pakistan and Afghan Taliban to take steps to address differences.

“We urge the Taliban to ensure that terrorist attacks are not launched from Afghan soil, and we urge Pakistan to exercise restraint and ensure civilians are not harmed in their counterterrorism efforts,” deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel told the media during a regular press briefing Monday.

Meanwhile, former Pakistani information minister Jan Achakzai warns that if the IEA keeps attacking Pakistan, Islamabad may seize the “Wakhan corridor.”

Achakzai wrote on his social media platform X on Wednesday that Pakistan would swiftly enter Afghanistan and annex the Wakhan corridor to gain access to the Central Asian countries.

The Wakhan Corridor is a narrow strip of land in northeastern Afghanistan, extending between Tajikistan, Pakistan, and China. It serves as a buffer zone between Afghanistan and its neighbors.

The Wakhan Corridor has historically been a significant trade route connecting Central Asia with South Asia and the Middle East. It played a crucial role in the ancient Silk Road network.

Latest News

Canada sent 19 failed asylum seekers back to Afghanistan last year

Published

on

Canada's border guards sent 19 rejected Afghan asylum seekers back to the country last year despite Otawa’s Temporary Suspension of Removals (TSR) that has been in place for Afghan nationals since 1994.

CBC reported that none of the 19 Afghans had their cases rejected on the basis of safety or security risks. The border service did not however reveal further details.

The border agency said a TSR is meant to "halt removals to a country or place when general conditions, such as armed conflict or an environmental disaster, pose a risk to the entire civilian population."

It also said individuals who were found inadmissible "on grounds of criminality, serious criminality, international or human rights violations, organized crime, or security" can be removed despite a TSR, CBC reported.

The CBSA said the 19 who failed their refugee claims left Canada "voluntarily," and that the Afghans were "aware that they benefit from a stay of removal due to the Temporary Suspension of Removal on Afghanistan but requested to have their removal order enforced despite the legislative stay.

"In other words, the individual was advised that they can remain in Canada until the TSR is lifted and they opted to return to Afghanistan."

Canada has welcomed some 54,000 Afghans since August 2021, surpassing a commitment it made to bring in 40,000 in 2021.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Trump team compiling list of military officers responsible for US withdrawal from Afghanistan

Trump has on a number of occasions condemned the withdrawal as a “humiliation” and “the most embarrassing day in the history of our country.” 

Published

on

The Trump transition team is compiling a list of senior current and former U.S. military officers who were directly involved in the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 and exploring whether they could be court-martialed. 
 
NBC reported that the team working on the transition of power between President-elect Donald Trump and outgoing President Joe Biden are considering creating a commission to investigate the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan.
 
Citing a US official and a person familiar with the plan, NBC stated a commission would then gather information about who was directly involved in the decision-making for the military, how it was carried out, and whether the military leaders could be eligible for charges as serious as treason.
 
“They’re taking it very seriously,” the person with knowledge of the plan said.
 
The Trump transition team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 
Matt Flynn, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for counternarcotics and global threats, is helping lead the effort, the sources said. 
 
Trump has on a number of occasions condemned the withdrawal as a “humiliation” and “the most embarrassing day in the history of our country.” 
 
NBC reports however that it is not clear what would legally justify “treason” charges since the military officers were following the orders of President Joe Biden to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
Continue Reading

Latest News

Ottawa taking detention of Canadian in Afghanistan ‘very seriously’

Lavery helped an estimated 100 Afghans flee Kabul during the chaotic withdrawal of US and allied forces.

Published

on

The Canadian government is taking "very seriously" the detention in Afghanistan of a former member of Canada's elite special forces, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Saturday.

Retired soldier David Lavery, known in Kabul as Canadian Dave, was detained by the Islamic Emirate shortly after landing in Kabul on Monday, according to Canadian broadcaster CTV News.

His whereabouts are unknown, the outlet added, citing unnamed sources.

Asked about Lavery, Trudeau said: "I can first of all assure you that the Canadian government is taking very, very seriously the situation."

He also said consular assistance has been provided to Lavery's family.

Lavery helped an estimated 100 Afghans flee Kabul during the chaotic withdrawal of US and allied forces.

He spent decades in the Canadian military and is said to have been a key member of its elite Joint Task Force 2 special operations unit.

More recently, Lavery has reportedly operated a private security firm in Kabul.

The Islamic Emirate has not yet commented.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Ariana News. All rights reserved!