Connect with us

Latest News

Gen McKenzie to recommend post-withdrawal plan for Afghanistan

Published

on

General Frank McKenzie, the Middle East commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM) said Wednesday he will make recommendations to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in early June on how to monitor and fight terrorist groups in Afghanistan from beyond its borders after all American forces withdraw.

McKenzie said negotiations with Afghanistan’s neighbors for overflight rights and troop basing are “moving forward” but will take time.

As a result, he said, the way the United States keeps an eye on the terrorist threat and aids the Afghan military will evolve as agreements are reached or security conditions on the ground change, The Associated Press reported.

He cautioned that this will be a “taxing time” for the Afghan military and “the risk is high.”

Speaking to reporters from The Associated Press and ABC News traveling with him to the Middle East, McKenzie declined to provide details about the recommendations he will make to Austin.

He said he will also provide cost estimates for keeping surveillance aircraft over Afghanistan regularly enough to keep track of terrorist groups after the U.S. pullout is completed.

McKenzie has made it clear that without any bases in neighboring countries, it will require far more aircraft to keep watch over Afghanistan because they will have to fly for four hours to six hours from other U.S. military installations in the Middle East.

The flight distance severely limits the amount of time the aircraft can spend in the air over Afghanistan, AP reported.

Military leaders are grappling with how best to carry out President Joe Biden’s order to withdraw all American troops from Afghanistan by September while still providing support to the Afghan forces and monitoring the threat that prompted the U.S. invasion of the country after the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Commanders have said they will monitor threats from “over the horizon,” to ensure that terrorists cannot again use Afghanistan as a base to launch attacks against the U.S. But they have acknowledged that the U.S. does not yet have any agreements for basing or overflights from any of the neighboring countries.

McKenzie said he is confident the U.S. will get the access it needs. But as yet, there are no firm solutions or decisions.

At the same time, Pentagon leaders and Congress members have expressed concerns that once the U.S. leaves, the Afghan government and its military will be quickly overrun by the Taliban.

The Afghan military, particularly its air force, has been heavily dependent on the U.S. for maintenance and training, as well as for combat air support when its troops are under attack. McKenzie said he believes the Afghans have a “fighting chance” to be successful and defend themselves.

“It’s time for the Afghan military to stand up and show that they can fight alone,” said McKenzie.

“I think it’s going to be a very taxing time for them. I think certainly there is a path for them to preserve what they have now. The risk is high. I don’t want to minimize that.”

He said that while the Taliban have not been attacking the U.S. or coalition troops, the violence against the Afghan people and the country’s military forces has been very high.

U.S. lawmakers have said they believe there is no chance the Taliban will abide by the commitments their leaders made in a February 2020 agreement with the Trump administration, which included engaging in sustained peace negotiations and severing all forms of cooperation with and support for al-Qaeda. Members of Congress also worry that al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group (Daesh) will take advantage of the chaos and regroup, with a goal of attacking the U.S. again.

McKenzie said that both al-Qaeda and IS have been degraded, AP reported.

“Our concern would be that ungoverned spaces open in Afghanistan and they are able to reassert themselves,” he said. “This would not be immediate. I don’t think anybody (thinks) this is something that will happen next month or even in the next six months. But eventually they will gather their strength again and they’ll be a threat to our homeland.”

Washington’s special envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, told a House hearing Tuesday that it is unduly pessimistic to predict that the Kabul government or Afghan military will be quickly overrun by the Taliban once U.S. and coalition forces withdraw.

He said the Taliban have reason not to push for a military victory and instead pursue a negotiated political settlement that could give them international legitimacy and removal from certain American and United Nations sanctions. He recently met with Taliban representatives in Doha, Qatar, as part of a round of consultations with interested parties.

Latest News

TAPI gas pipeline advances 25 km in Afghanistan

Published

on

Afghanistan’s Ministry of Mines and Petroleum says construction of the TAPI Gas Pipeline is advancing steadily in Herat Province, with significant milestones already achieved.

According to the ministry, around 25 kilometers of the pipeline have been laid so far, while preparations for an additional 120 kilometers are now complete. The arrival of new pipes and technical equipment to the project site is expected to further accelerate construction in the coming months.

Homayoun Afghan, spokesperson for the ministry, said work on the Herat section of the project is progressing according to plan and is expected to be completed by the end of the current calendar year.

The TAPI pipeline, a major regional energy initiative linking Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India, is seen as a key driver of economic growth and regional cooperation. Afghan officials have repeatedly emphasized its potential to create jobs, boost revenues, and strengthen energy connectivity across the region.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Afghan diaspora protests in London and Oslo over Pakistan strikes

At the same time, members of the Afghan community in Oslo gathered outside the Norwegian Parliament, where they denounced the attacks and called for accountability.

Published

on

Hundreds of Afghans living abroad staged protests in the cities of London and Oslo over the weekend, condemning what they described as continued military attacks by Pakistan that have led to rising civilian casualties in eastern Afghanistan.

In London, demonstrators marched through central streets, chanting slogans against the strikes and urging global powers to take urgent action.

Protesters highlighted the deteriorating security situation along the disputed Durand Line, warning that repeated shelling risks further destabilizing already fragile  communities. Many called for independent investigations and greater international pressure to prevent escalation.

At the same time, members of the Afghan community in Oslo gathered outside the Norwegian Parliament, where they denounced the attacks and called for accountability.

Protest organizers said a formal resolution was submitted to Norwegian authorities, as well as to the United Nations and the International Criminal Court, urging immediate steps to halt the violence and ensure the protection of civilians.

The demonstrations come amid renewed tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan, where clashes and artillery exchanges have periodically flared along the Durand Line.

Disputes over the legitimacy of the frontier, militant activity, and cross Durand Line security operations have long strained relations between the two neighbors.

According to Afghan officials, the latest incident occurred in Asadabad, the capital of Kunar Province, where Pakistani forces allegedly fired mortars and heavy weapons into residential areas on Sunday evening.

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesman for the Islamic Emirate, said Pakistan targeted rural communities on the outskirts of the city at around 5 pm local time. Preliminary reports indicate that at least 16 civilians—mostly women and children—were injured, while one person was killed.

Fitrat condemned the incident as a continuation of attacks against Afghan civilians, while local residents described panic and damage to homes caused by the shelling.

There has been no immediate detailed response from Pakistani authorities regarding the latest allegations. However, Islamabad has previously maintained that its military actions along the Durand Line are aimed at countering militant threats and securing its frontier regions.

The protests in Europe reflect growing concern within the Afghan diaspora over the humanitarian impact of the ongoing tensions, with calls mounting for diplomatic engagement to prevent further civilian harm and escalation along the Durand Line.

 

Continue Reading

International Sports

Amnesty International raises alarm over deportations, protests ahead of FIFA World Cup

The rights watchdog said the situation is most acute in the US under President Donald Trump, where it says a “human rights emergency” is unfolding due to aggressive immigration enforcement policies.

Published

on

A new report released on Monday, 30 March, by Amnesty International has warned that the 2026 FIFA World Cup could expose millions of fans to serious human rights risks, particularly in the United States, where the majority of matches will be held.

The report, titled Humanity Must Win: Defending rights, tackling repression at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, highlights concerns across all three host nations—United States, Canada and Mexico—including threats to freedom of expression, peaceful protest, and the safety of local communities.

According to Amnesty International, the situation is most acute in the United States under President Donald Trump, where it says a “human rights emergency” is unfolding due to aggressive immigration enforcement policies.

The organization cited mass detentions, arbitrary arrests, and widespread deportations carried out by agencies such as US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Customs and Border Protection.

Amnesty International’s Head of Economic and Social Justice, Steve Cockburn, said more than 500,000 people were deported from the United States in 2025 alone, warning that the erosion of due process has created “a climate of fear” that could affect both residents and visiting fans during the tournament.

The report also raises concerns about the impact of these policies on World Cup host cities, noting that local authorities in cities such as Dallas, Houston and Miami have entered agreements with federal immigration agencies, increasing the risk of racial profiling and undermining trust in law enforcement.

In addition, Amnesty International highlighted previous federal deployments of thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration raids, warning that similar measures during the World Cup could threaten civil liberties.

Beyond the United States, the report points to risks in the other host countries. In Mexico, the deployment of around 100,000 security personnel—including military forces—has raised fears that protests could be suppressed, particularly by activists planning demonstrations linked to disappearances and social justice issues in Mexico City.

In Canada, Amnesty International warned that preparations for the tournament could worsen an already deepening housing crisis, citing concerns that people experiencing homelessness may be displaced, echoing the legacy of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver.

The organization also flagged travel restrictions that could prevent fans from several countries, including Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti, Iran and Senegal, from entering the United States, alongside proposals for intrusive screening measures such as social media vetting.

Amnesty International further warned that restrictions on freedom of expression and peaceful assembly across all three host nations could undermine the inclusive spirit of the tournament. It noted that protests—often a feature of global sporting events—risk being repressed, with recent examples including crackdowns on demonstrations in North America.

With just weeks to go before the tournament begins, Amnesty International urged FIFA and host governments to take immediate action to safeguard human rights.

“This World Cup is no longer the ‘medium risk’ tournament that FIFA once judged it to be,” said Cockburn.

“Urgent steps are needed to ensure fans, players, workers and communities are protected, and that the tournament lives up to its promise of being safe, inclusive and respectful of human rights,” he said.

Amnesty International added that while FIFA stands to generate record revenues from the competition, the rights and safety of those involved must remain at the centre of the event.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Ariana News. All rights reserved!